Social Protocols

Essays on the design of social protocols for improving public discourse

What Is a Social Protocol?

Introduction

The rules that determine what gets attention on social platforms are often called “algorithms,” but algorithms are only part of the story. Another way to understand social platforms is as social protocols, or sets of formal and informal rules that communities use to allocate their collective attention.

Like parliamentary procedure or courtroom rules, social protocols shape conversations: they determine what topics are discussed and which voices are heard. Understanding these protocols can help explain phenomena we see in social networks—like filter bubbles, polarization, and misinformation—and suggest ways social protocols could be engineered to promote healthier outcomes.

Philosophy

Various philosophical musings

Featured image of post Victims, Villains, Heroes: Righteous Outrage and Social Status

Victims, Villains, Heroes: Righteous Outrage and Social Status

Politics and Social Status

People’s politics are partly driven by a desire for status.

People tend to express political views that will win the approval of their peers. They tend to remain silent if they hold opinions that would be criticized by their peers.

These belief systems become self-reinforcing in each subgroup of society. Churchgoers tend to adopt the beliefs of their congregation. Hollywood actors tend to adopt the beliefs of Hollywood. Police tend to share political views with other police. And so on.

Theory

Somewhat technical articles on a variety of theoretical subjects

Entropy as a Measure of Uncertainty

Measuring Uncertainty

How do you measure uncertainty?

That may seem like an odd question, but let’s just dive right into it, because it leads us down an interesting path to the definition of entropy.

I’m 99% Certain

We can start with one common way people express certainty. You might say “I’m 99% certain it will rain today”. This, of course, implies that you’re 1% uncertain.

On the other hand, if you say “I’m 50% certain it will rain”, then you’re 50% uncertain.

Travel

Some travel writing

Featured image of post Mekong Lights

Mekong Lights

The Mystery

Abdul wanted to see the Mekong Lights. He had seen a Thai movie eight years ago called Mekong Full Moon Party. It was a fictional story featuring one of the world’s most fascinating unexplained phenomena: mysterious balls of light that up shoot from the Mekong every year, as the full moon rises on the eleventh month of the lunar calendar. Ever since, Abdul had been saving money and dreaming of the day he would make the pilgrimage to see these lights.

Programming Language Design

Various ideas on the design of programming languages

Featured image of post Functional Equality: When 2+2 does not equal 4.0

Functional Equality: When 2+2 does not equal 4.0

Introduction

In this post, I discuss the concept of functional equality.

If two values $a$ and $b$ are functionally equal, then there should exist no function $f$ for which $f(a)$ does not equal $f(b)$. For mathematically-minded readers, we can give a more precise definition:

$$ a = b ⟺ ∀f ~ f(a) = f(b) $$

In many programming languages, the == operator does not test for functional equality. For example, the integer 4 and the float 4.0 can be equal according to the == operator, and yet an integer and a float generally are not functionally equal. For example, their string representations will typically differ. If toString(4) != toString(4.0), then 4 and 4.0 are not functionally equal by the definition above.

_Drafts

What is Digital Democracy?

“Democracy is a technology. Like any technology, it gets better when more people strive to improve it.”

– Audrey Tang, Taiwan’s first digital minister

There is increasing momentum in the world of “digital democracy”. But I don’t think the general public understands what digital democracy is, nor its potential to make the world a better place.

In a very general sense, digital democracy just means the use of digital technology in the democratic process. But digital democracy is more than just a government I.T. department. Its potential is not limited to making existing democratic processes more efficient and modern. Rather, it promises a new paradigm for democracy that is more fundamentally democratic, because citizens more directly and effectively control government. New technology not only makes more direct participation possible; it can make democratic processes more fair, transparent, and resistant to manipulation and concentration of power; it can help people make decisions that are more informed and intelligent; and it can help groups overcome the dilemmas of collective action that prevent us from coordinating to solve some of humanities biggest problems.